I would be curious to hear the take by some of you financial types. What would be the reasoning for the state government to bail out everyone else before the taxpayers? how does this make sense?
Illinois Democrats preparing to bail out bankers and cash-strapped local governments
"Senate Bill 10, if enacted, would create a mechanism for a backdoor bailout of bondholders and broke governments. SB 10 would allow home rule municipalities, such as Chicago, to issue new debt that gives lenders special protection in case the municipality fails to pay them back. "
"House Bill 278 complements SB 10 because it increases state distribution dollars to local governments by $300 million per year by boosting the Local Government Distributive Fund. HB 278, sponsored by state Rep. Anthony DeLuca, D-Chicago Heights, increases the very type of state distributions to local governments against which banks could make the first claim if SB 10 passes, making the two pieces of legislation a creative way to give a backdoor bailout to local governments and their bondholders. HB 278 had 33 cosponsors, all Democrats, and passed the Illinois House with the overwhelming majority of votes in favor coming from Democrats."
this is the kicker:
"House Bill 2584, also sponsored by DeLuca, is yet another bill that gives banks and bondholders the first spot in line if a local government gets in trouble. HB 2584 is perhaps the worst of all the bailout proposals, because it puts a blanket mortgage on all of a local government’s future tax revenue in order to pay bondholders ahead of taxpayers and government services.
This is a huge giveaway to bondholders – it even gives the bondholders a statutory first lien on future tax dollars for bonds that were issued in the past under different terms. If HB 2584 becomes law, it will be a handout to bondholders likely worth millions or perhaps billions of dollars, courtesy of the Illinois General Assembly. HB 2584 passed out of the House Cities and Villages Committee on a unanimous vote."
Illinois (Chicago) still attracting the young, high earners.
NYT - The States That College Graduates Are Most Likely to Leave
Last edited by GEman; 04-04-2017 at 11:41 AM.
thank you for not answering my question.
Sold as good for borrowers, it just allows them still another bite of the apple. It really does much more, and looks written for the buyside and brokers while closing off and chaining shut the exit doors for taxpayers. There are quite a few proposed changes elsewhere in the pipeline, including a "distressed local authority" to step in and 'reorganize' on demand.to help "municipalities provide financing at the lowest possible costs with the least amount of concern over bankruptcy."
We deserve to get reamed, just look at D41's incompetence with their bond proposal - they (including our highly paid in house CPA-MBA responsible for it) couldn't even read it. That bond, as proposed by D41, would put you in jail if you constructed it for your neighbor and ripped them for size while quoting 4.2%.
Some tough love for one community in particular: West suburban residents who live in Hinsdale HS D86 will be asked to approve a $76 million bond referendum.
If voters agree, D86 will borrow that $76 million, and interest costs will add one-third of the advertised price tag. So the total cost is closer to $100 million when you add up what the bond holders will charge over the life of the bonds.
What are residents getting for all that money? School building improvements and a handful of new classrooms at the district's two schools, Hinsdale South and Hinsdale Central. Roughly one-third of the money will go toward swimming pool improvements and updated diving pits.
Why? Because, my gosh, Hinsdale high schools are unable to host water polo championships due to pool accommodations.
Let that sink in a minute.
Last edited by jombl; 04-04-2017 at 01:49 PM.
The thought at Axe Capital in terms of forcing austerity to collect on the Sandicot bonds was that it's just survival of the fittest. If a municipality cannot meet it's bond obligations its deserves to wither away and die.
Hi, I'm Jombl for Jactitation Capital. Are you positioned for the coming meltdown ...
Last edited by GEman; 04-04-2017 at 07:29 PM.
Why a law is necessary I am not entirely sure. There has to be some issue with existing priority/preemption that they're worried about.
If I remember correctly it is not currently possible for Illinois municipalities to file for bankruptcy. There has been some discussion of allowing that but the unions who basically tell the Democratic party in Illinois what to do have been opposed to it. So it hasn't gone very far. So the necessity of the law is strange. Should things get very bad in Illinois or should I say when things get very bad there. They may have to allow some kind of bankruptcy. But then all of that would have to be put into the bankruptcy law. Illinois of course already has the nations worst credit rating and the fact that you're digging yourself deeper into debt by 12M a day every single day. Probably makes the bankers a little nervous. So maybe they are thinking this may ease some of their concerns. But look at Detroit and Puerto Rico both saw bankers, investors take very deep haircuts. As for this being a bailout for the bankers. Well no one held a gun to your head and forced you to vote for people who drove your state off a fiscal cliff. Its your debt you pay it back.
Oh I guess all the people leaving Cook aren't heading for DuPage